Categories
Featured Articles

Eat Breakfast- Lose Weight

By Serena Gordon

THURSDAY, June 19 (HealthDay News) — Starting your day with a large meal packed with both carbohydrates and lean protein, and even a small piece of chocolate, can help lessen cravings and hunger the rest of the day, which can lead to significant weight loss, new research suggests.

Presented at this week's Endocrine Society annual meeting, in San Francisco, the new research found that sedentary, obese women lost almost five times as much weight on the "big breakfast" diet as did women following a traditional, restrictive low-carbohydrate diet.

"We treat obese people by telling them to eat less and exercise more, but that does not take into account feelings of carb cravings and hunger. We have to change our approach and find a diet that can control cravings and hunger," said the study's lead author, Dr. Daniela Jakubowicz, a clinical professor at Virginia Commonwealth University and an endocrinologist at the Hospital de Clinicas Caracas in Venezuela.

Jakubowicz explained that when you wake in the morning, your body is primed to look for food. Your metabolism is revved up, and levels of cortisol and adrenaline are at their highest. Your brain needs energy right away, and if you don't eat or you eat too little, the brain needs to find another fuel source. To do this, it activates an emergency system that pulls energy from muscle, destroying muscle tissue in the process. Then when you eat later, the body and brain are still in high-alert mode, so the body saves energy from the food as fat, she said.

Compounding the problem, your levels of the brain chemical serotonin are highest in the morning, which means your craving levels are at the lowest when you first wake up, and you may not feel much like eating, Jakubowicz said. But, as the day wears on, serotonin levels dip, and you get cravings for chocolate or cookies, and the like. If you eat these foods, your serotonin levels rise, and your body begins to associate good feelings with them, creating an addictive cycle, she said.

To combat both the addiction cycle and the hunger that inevitably seems to come with calorie reduction, Jakubowicz and her colleagues designed the "big breakfast" diet. In this eating plan, your breakfast accounts for roughly half of your daily calories, and breakfast includes milk, 3 ounces of lean meat, two slices of cheese, two whole grain servings, one fat serving and one ounce of milk chocolate or candy.

The high protein, carbohydrate mix gives the body the initial energy boost it needs in the morning. Throughout the rest of the day, the meals are made up of protein and complex carbohydrates, like vegetables. Because protein is digested slowly, Jakubowicz said, you won't feel hungry.

And, she said, by having a small piece of chocolate or candy when serotonin levels are high, it won't taste as good, and the brain won't feel the same serotonin boost, which will eventually help cut down on cravings.

In the study of 94 obese, sedentary women with metabolic syndrome, half were told to eat the big breakfast diet containing about 1,240 calories, while the other half ate a 1,085 calorie high-protein, low carbohydrate diet for eight months.

At the end of the eight months, those on the more restrictive low-carb diet lost an average of almost 9 pounds. But those on the big breakfast diet lost nearly40pounds. That translated to an average body mass loss of 4.5 percent for those on the low-carb diet and a 21.3 percent average loss for those on the big breakfast plan.

Additionally, those on the big breakfast plan reported feeling less hungry and had fewer carbohydrate cravings.

Nutritionist Geri Brewster, a wellness consultant at Northern Westchester Hospital Center in Mount Kisco, N.Y., said she already recommends a large, well-balanced breakfast to all of her clients, because it helps to keep blood sugar levels stable.

She said if you eat a traditional breakfast, something like cereal or a doughnut, your blood sugar and insulin levels spike. Once that blood sugar is used up, you'll still have excess insulin circulating, which makes you hungry and makes you crave carbohydrates.

A second study presented at the meeting reinforced the idea that biological changes occur when you carry excess weight, Brewster said. This study found that women who are overweight don't experience a drop in leptin levels after exercise like lean women do.

Leptin is a hormone that plays a role in appetite regulation and metabolism. Brewster said she wasn't surprised by these findings, because once the body is overweight, it tries to maintain that size. "Fat cells become mini-endocrine systems themselves to maintain obesity," she said, and keeping leptin levels elevated is likely one way the body does that.

Categories
Featured Articles

Hormone Helps Keep Weight Off

ScienceDaily (June 24, 2008) — Individuals who are obese are at increased risk of many diseases, including type 2 diabetes and heart disease. As 75%-95% of previously obese individuals regain their lost weight, many researchers are interested in developing treatments to help individuals maintain their weight loss.

A new study, by Michael Rosenbaum and colleagues, at Columbia University Medical Center, New York, has provided new insight into the critical interaction between the hormone leptin and the brain's response to weight loss.

Leptin levels fall as obese individuals lose weight. So, the authors set out to see whether changes in leptin levels altered activity in the regions of the brain known to have a role in regulating food intake.

They observed that activity in these regions of the brain in response to visual food-related cues changed after an obese individual successfully lost weight. However, these changes in brain activity were not observed if the obese individual who had successfully lost weight was treated with leptin. These data are consistent with the idea that the decrease in leptin levels that occurs when an individual loses weight serves to protect the body against the loss of body fat.

Further, both the authors and, in an accompanying commentary, Rexford Ahima, at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, suggest that leptin therapy after weight loss might improve weight maintenance by overriding this fat-loss defense.

Categories
Featured Articles

Largest Twins Ever?

(ABC News) A North Carolina woman has given birth to possibly the biggest twins ever born in recent history. The Maynard couple said they were shocked when the first baby came out.
 
 

Sean William Maynard was 10 pounds and 14 ounces, but when Abigail Rose Maynard was born, she outweighed her brother with 12 pounds, 3 ounces. Together, the twins tipped the scales at 23 pounds, 1 ounce.  The heaviest twins on record in the country were born in Arkansas in 1927. They weighed a total of 27 pounds, 12 ounces.

Categories
Health & Freedom

A Major Victory for Texas

by Ron Paul

I am pleased to report that last week we received notice that the Texas Department of Transportation will recommend the I-69 Project be developed using existing highway facilities instead of the proposed massive new Trans Texas Corridor/NAFTA Superhighway.  According to the Texas Transportation Commissioner, consideration is no longer being given to new corridors and other proposals for a new highway footprint for this project.  A major looming threat to property rights and national sovereignty is removed with this encouraging announcement. 

 

Public outcry was cited as the main reason for this decision.  I was very impressed to learn that the TxDOT received nearly 28,000 public comments on this matter, and that some 12,000 Texans attended the 47 public hearings held earlier this year.  They could not ignore this tsunami of strong public opinion against the proposed plans.  I was especially proud of how informed my constituents became on the subject, and how eloquently and respectfully they spoke and conducted themselves, considering how upsetting the plans were for our communities in Texas .

This is a major victory for the people of Texas , and a reminder of what we can accomplish with civic involvement.  The informed and active citizen truly is a force to be reckoned with, as we have seen with the defeat of this proposal.  We must keep fighting the good fight, and remain ever diligent against the encroachments of big government.  We must do this if we wish to maintain our traditional standard of living in this country.  As tempting as it may be to simply live our lives with no regard to government, apathy will inevitably be punished by ever more government intrusion.  That is what this fight was all about.  We can win if we stick together.

However, now is not the time to rest on our laurels.  The bittersweet aspect of this victory is that we had to fight at all.  We took time away from family and friends, doing other things, to attend these meetings, inform others, write letters, post signs and submit our complaints, and we should not have had to.  Government should let us be, if we are peaceful citizens, harming no one.  In a perfect world, government could be trusted to act in the best interests of the people without overwhelming pressure of this kind.  This is not a perfect world.  Constant pressure is needed to keep government in check, and we succeeded this time.  But this will not be the last time citizen efforts and involvement will be required.  We still face many unreasonable encroachments of big government today, from confiscatory, economy-strangling taxation to creeping disregard of the right of habeas corpus and other Constitutional rights, to thousands of nuisance bureaucratic regulations interfering with our every day lives.  We have drifted far from what the founding fathers envisioned for this nation.  Last week was just one victory towards getting back on the right path.  We must continue to hold politicians’ feet to the Constitutional fire.  If I had to guess, they will probably try to implement the NAFTA Superhighway again sometime in the future.

It is a never-ending battle, but it must be fought, and can be won.  I am proud to stand with my constituents in this fight, and in the other fights we have ahead of us.

Categories
Healthy Recipes

Chicken Ratatouille

Fat: 6.5 g
Carbohydrates: 19.2g
Calories: 253.3
Protein: 31.5g

Served over rice, this delicious dish is loaded with vegetables and skinless chicken breasts, making it a lower fat, lower salt one-dish meal. Ingredients:

1 tablespoon olive oil
4 medium chicken breast halves, skinned, and fat removed, boned, and cut into 1-inch pieces
2 zucchini, about 7″ long, unpeeled and thinly sliced
1 small eggplant, peeled and cut into 1″ cubes
1 medium onion, thinly sliced
1 medium green pepper, cut into 1″ pieces
1/2 lb. fresh mushrooms, sliced
1 can (16 oz.) whole tomatoes, cut up
1 clove garlic, minced
1 1/2 teaspoon dried basil, crushed
1 tablespoon fresh parsley, minced
black pepper to taste

Instructions:

1. Heat oil in large nonstick skillet. Add chicken and saute about 3 minutes, or until lightly browned.

2. Add zucchini, eggplant, onion, green pepper, and mushrooms. Cook about 15 minutes, stirring occasionally.

3. Add tomatoes, garlic, basil, parsley, and pepper; stir and continue cooking about 5 minutes, or until chicken is tender and cooked through.

Categories
Ask Utopia Silver

Cellulitis

Q:
Utopia Silver,

I’ve had cellulitis for 8 months and have been given every type of antibiotic and it’s still red.  Doctors will not operate on the leg until they are sure it’s completely healed. I’m also having a knee replacement. I need suggestions please. What is the best solution and what can I do in addition to what is already being done. Is there a specialist that I should be seeing?

Thanks,
Charles in Florida
A:
Hi Charles,

Many have had success with Advanced Colloidal Silver in dealing with cellulitis. (See the Testimonials and more info on Cellulitis at http://utopiasilver.com/testimonials/cellulitis.htm)

You may want to try silver and aloe vera gel (http://www.utopiasilver.com/products/supplements/silveraloe.htm) and Utopia Naturals Silver Aloe Soap (http://www.utopiasilver.com/products/supplements/skincare.htm)

Categories
Health & Freedom

Food Crisis

by Al Adask 
Market Oracle recently published an article entitled “Grain Markets Panic Buying, Export Controls, and Food Riots.” In this article, author Joseph Dancy reports that “Long term global demand and supply trends in the agricultural sector remain very favorable for investors. New and expanding biofuel facilities, growing global population, and the upgrading of diets in many Asian countries continues to increase demand for grains at a rapid pace.”

Thus, people who not only have enough money to eat but even enough “extra” money to invest, may profit handsomely from the growing food shortage. However, those hundreds of millions of poor and even middle class people who have barely enough money to buy their food, let alone money to invest, may soon face levels of hunger, starvation, and even famine that are unprecedented in human history.

 Growth in the world’s food supply is currently restricted by recent export controls by many grain producing countries, drought in several producing regions, and the lack of readily available acreage suitable for expanding farming operations. Western agriculture methods are also incredibly energy intensive, which increases the cost of expanding supplies.

Mr. Dancy reports that the following developments occurred in the agricultural sector just last month:

The collapse of Australia ’s rice production has helped double of price of rice in just the last three months. Price increases have led the world’s largest exporters to restrict exports, spurred panicked hoarding in Hong Kong and the Philippines, and set off violent protests in countries including Cameroon, Egypt, Ethiopia, Haiti, Indonesia, Italy, Ivory Coast, Mauritania , the Philippines , Thailand , Uzbekistan and Yemen .

U.S. restaurants and other large-scale customers are buying so much rice that Costco, Sam’s Club and other wholesalers have put limits on the amounts they sell. This has resulted in some individual stores in places like California reportedly running out of rice. Global shifts in the commodity markets have caused the prices of corn, wheat, rice and soybeans to hit record levels.

The price of rice, the staple food for half the world, is double the price a year ago and a fivefold increase from 2001.

The cost (in dollars) of staple foods are at least 50% higher than they were this time last year. The UN has declared, “We consider that the dramatic escalation in food prices worldwide has evolved into an unprecedented challenge of global proportions that has become a crisis for the world’s most vulnerable, including the urban poor. ”

The price of some fertilizers has nearly tripled in price in the last year. Some Midwest dealers ran out of fertilizer last fall, and continue to restrict sales because of a limited supply. Supplies are expected to remain tight for years.

Stem rust is the most feared of all wheat diseases. It can turn a healthy crop of wheat into a tangled mass of stems that produce little or no grain. It has caused major famines since the beginning of history. A new strain of stem rust, called Ug99 was discovered in Uganda in 1999, and is much more devastating than those that, 50 years ago, destroyed the American wheat crop. Agricultural scientists have been unable to find an effective defense against it. After being restricted to East Africa, Ug99 has now been identified in Yemen.

Agricultural meteorologist Elwynn Taylor estimates the odds of a major American drought at 1 in 3, about double the usual risk. A major drought typically strikes the Midwest every 18 or 19 years. The last one hit in 1988. Taylor noted the average length of time between major Midwest droughts is 18.6 years. “The longest gap between major droughts in 800 years is 23 years, so if we don’t have a drought by 2011, we’ll break an 800 year-old record,” Taylor said “We’re overdue,” he noted.

In many areas of the Midwest the corn planting schedules are well behind schedule, raising the potential for a shortfall.

Since January of 2007, the price of wheat has gone up 200% and corn 150%.

Desperate poor have already rioted in 34 countries this year. Thomas Malthus predicted in the early 1800s that population would grow faster than food supplies and that ultimately, millions of people would starve. We may soon reach “Peak Food”…the point at which the world can produce no more food while the human population keeps growing.

Last week, the U.S. Senate approved the latest farm bill by the largest margin since 1973. There is something in the farm bill for almost every scoundrel and bounder in the country. Poor people get more free food. Rich people get more subsidies. The total cost of the bill is $307 billion over five years.

UNITED NATIONS, May 19 (IPS) – Vicente Garcia-Delgado, the U.N. representative for CIVICUS, warned, “A rolling tsunami of social unrest is underway as we speak—hungry people are desperate people capable of taking desperate actions. This tsunami is rapidly enveloping the global South, and it won’t take much longer before it knocks at the door of the global North.”

A UN forum on the world food crisis stressed that over 800 million people are now at risk of starvation and 100 million have joined the ranks of the extremely poor in just the last few months and are now living on less than a dollar a day.

While the U.S. government assures us that the inflation rate is only about 4.5%, the UN’s food price index rose by 9 percent in 2006 and 23 percent in 2007. As of March this year, wheat and maize prices were 130 and 30 percent higher than a year earlier. Rice prices have more than doubled since late January.

The UN’s Garcia-Delgado said, “Governments must not fall prey to the temptation to seek unilateral solutions based on defensive or militaristic non-solutions. It would be extremely dangerous to look at the current crisis strictly from a national perspective. A knee-jerk resort to a ‘fortress America‘ or a ‘fortress Europe‘ type of mentality would only exacerbate the risks of social and political chaos and will not work.”

Asma Lateef, director of Bread for the World Institute, said that rising global food prices are driven by at least four structural changes. One factor is growing demand for food; secondly, competition for land use and diversion of crops posed by biofuels; third, weather-related crop failures possibly associated with climate change; and fourth, rising oil prices, as all contributing to food inflation.

I am fascinated to see that Ms Lateef does not suggests that “food inflation” can be traced to dollar inflation—which can be traced to the fact that our dollars are no longer backed by gold, silver or oil and thus intrinsically worthless.

Lateef also said, “Special lines of credit and guarantees should be also made available to enable net food importing countries to meet the needs of poor people and continue to purchase food on international markets, in ways that do not raise debt burdens . . . .”

“Fat”(if you’ll excuse the pun) chance.

Lateef is asking that the wealthy, grain-producing nations give the poor nations credit (that does not raise debt burdens on the poor) for debts that will never be repaid for grain that may already be in short supply in the grain-producing countries. In other words, Lateef is asking for free food for hundreds of millions.

Lateef’s request is a fantasy. There may be a handful of “gestures” that offer “special lines of credit” to the starving nations, but those gestures can’t and won’t be sufficient to provide enough grain to feed 800 million or more who are starving. Who will make these “gestures”? The US? We’re already broke. Our food supplies are still ample but increasingly expensive. What politician is going to offer more than a handful of grain giveaways in this economic climate? If we don’t feed the world’s poor, who will?

What can’t be paid, won’t be paid. What can’t be provided, won’t be provided.

The era of easy promises is gone. We are now in a world where real money is king. Mere paper “promises to pay” will be increasingly viewed with contempt.

My guess is that we’ll witness 100 million people die from famine over the next 12 to 24 months. My guess is that we’ll see global political instability on a scale that exceeds WWII as millions riot and overthrow their government for failing to provide food. My guess is that we’ll see global free trade impaired and decimated as the wealthy, agriculturally-productive nations retreat into the “fortress Europe” and “fortress America” mentality. My guess is that we shall see the hungriest nations begin to invade their neighbors by means of illegal aliens or overt war. (I can’t help wondering, What nation is both a significant source of grain and is also close enough to China to be subject to a land invasion? Taiwan, perhaps?)

We are fast-approaching an era of famine and political instability that will afflict the entire globe. Here in the USA, I don’t expect people to die from starvation, nor do I expect a shooting revolution—however, both of these consequences are possible if the food distribution system breaks down. But if the food distribution system holds together, prices and unemployment are going to rise, financial and political stress is going to rise, the dollar will fail and die, and most people’s hold on any semblance of prosperity will grow increasingly tenuous.

Serious troubles likely to last for several years are headed our way. Prudent people should prepare.

We are sitting on the edge of a global catastrophe. It is irrational to suppose that any of us will escape absolutely unscathed. What do you need? Food, guns, gold. Friends you can rely on. And a solid association with God.

This is no game. Buckle up.

And if the previously described problems with the global food supply weren’t bad enough, even the bees are disappearing.

According to NaturalNews, the ongoing phenomenon of mysterious honeybee deaths is starting to raise alarm in the food industry, which depends heavily on bees to pollinate 130 different crops, which supply $15 billion worth of food and ingredients each year. One-third of the U.S. food supply depends on honeybee pollination.

In late 2006, beekeepers in the United States began to notice that unusual numbers of honeybees were dying during the winter. Beekeepers reported losing between 30 and 90 percent of their bees, in contrast to the usual 20 to 25 percent. The phenomenon, which continued through last winter, remains unexplained.

NaturalNews: “A global famine is not out of the question, especially when you combine the loss of honeybee populations with the situation of rapidly deteriorating soil quality across the world’s farmlands. . . . . Eventually humans will live in balance with nature. The question is whether we will consciously create that balance as a mature species, or if we will be starved into submission by a global ecosystem that refuses to support such a large population of human beings.”

Note that the previous quote is from NaturalNews—which I suspect should be a fairly benign, non-political publication. But when even the tree-huggers begin to talk about “a large population . . . starved into submission,” we are seeing faint evidence that some very pacifistic people recognize that tens of millions—maybe hundreds of millions—of people may not only soon die from starvation, but that such losses might not only be inevitable, but perhaps even desirable.

Too many people plus not enough food means that some of the people—lots of the people—have to die. That logic and inevitability creates a recognition of a fundamental “truth” that overwhelms sentiment and inspires a system of values where the deaths of others may be recognized as beneficial. This points to a shift in global values wherein we move from even the pretext of liberal “do-gooder-ism” into a system of values based on ruthless objectivity. In such system, if you want something, you’d better be able to pay for it or do without. No more Mister Nice Guy. No more easy credit. The world will no longer accept a promise to pay as if it were a payment. They will demand payment for food, and if you can’t pay—not promise to pay with legal tender or debt instruments, but actually pay with something tangible like gold or silver—you may starve.

NaturalNews: “The alarm bells are ringing, folks. We have reached the limit of the planet’s ability to absorb our pollution and environmental devastation. I sadly predict the human species is not mature enough to make the necessary forward-thinking changes, and that it will only learn from disaster. That disaster is coming. Prepare to live in a world where food becomes desperately scarce. Prepare to see the human population collapse in almost precisely the same way the honeybee populations are collapsing. As go the insects, so go humans.”

I remember growing up in the 1950s and 1960s in northern Illinois. In the summer, if anyone wanted to go in or out of our house at night, we could only turn the porch light on for a minute or two and hustle into or out of the house. Why? Because scores, maybe hundreds of bugs would quickly swarm to any night light, so if we turned on the porch light for more than a minute or so before we opened the door, when we finally opened the door, we’d have scores of bugs fly into the house.

I remember clearly, that in the summertime, there wasn’t a streetlight in the entire town that wasn’t surrounded by a cloud of hundreds, maybe thousands of insects, every single summer night.

And you couldn’t drive your car for 15 minutes without getting the windshield and front bumper, grill and radiator coated with the sticky bodies of dead bugs.

Today, I live on Texas and we can turn lights on all night around the house and hardly ever attract a flying bug. I doubt that I’ve seen a street light in twenty years that attracted more than a handful of insects. We can drive hundreds of miles and barely ever see an insect smash into the windshield. If I had to guess, I’d say that the flying insect population has been cut by 99%—maybe 99.9%—since I was a kid.

I don’t much like insects but there is something very disturbing about living in a world where flying insects no longer flourish. Given the loss of all those flying “pests” over the past 50 years, it’s no surprise that the honey bees are also disappearing. And if honey bees are crucial to one-third of our supply of food—and disappearing at a time when food is already in short supply—I see just another dot in a constellation of problems that seems almost inescapable.

Connect the dots. Make up your own mind. See if you agree with me that we are heading toward trouble that may be catastrophic.

Again, this is no game.

Buckle up.

Categories
Featured Articles

Western Medicine Fails

by Byron Richards
 
(NaturalNews) The shocking death of Tim Russert last Friday has left an entire nation wondering what happened. He was a model patient, doing everything his doctors asked.
All major media have run articles trying to explain the nuances and difficulties in treating coronary artery disease. These articles find little fault in Russert's care, trying to create the idea that his heart attack was just too hard to predict and that all that could have been done for him was done. I beg to differ. His death represents the failure of standard medical care to produce a positive result – an occurrence that is all too common in today's world.

Talk show hosts lament the death of Russert as the death of an icon and one of the last men of news not suffering from flagrant political bias. His piercing, accurate, and fair questions often got to the source of many issues and exposed the truth for what it was. Now that he is gone who is left to ask the questions – even about his death?

Russert's doctor, Michael Newman, has not disclosed his medication list or any specific changes in medication doses in the past year. Why? What is he trying to hide? Russert's death is a matter of tremendous public interest, partly because the man was admired by so many and partly because there are millions of men out there wondering if they are the next Tim Russert. There is no excuse for anything but full disclosure of his health issues so that a proper public dialogue can take place that may help many others.

A Glaring Omission of the Facts

The most glaring omitted information from Russert's doctor is telling us what diabetes medication he was taking. I am willing to bet that he was taking Avandia, the drug the FDA should have pulled off the market because it causes a whopping 43% increased risk of a sudden heart attack, information the FDA actively sought to sequester during that drug's approval process. Why do I think that? Because in the scant health data his doctor is giving out he has stated that Russert had high triglycerides and low HDL cholesterol – the exact metabolic profile that Avandia is supposed to treat. When a treatment has death as a common side effect it can hardly be considered a treatment.

Could it be that Russert is a casualty of one of the great Big Pharma/FDA scams currently going on? How ironic, since all news programs are sponsored by this industry's ads and the media fought tooth and claw in the past year to ensure that dangerous drug ads could continue to run non-stop during all news programs – exposing millions of Americans to drug-induced injury (while they got their billions in ad revenues). I am stunned that no reporter interviewing his doctor seems to be able to ask such an obvious question.

 

Russert's Doctor Failed Him

Russert was significantly obese and had been for many years. Any doctor that couldn't guess his coronary arteries were full of plaque is not very bright. Once a man's waistline passes 40 inches you can rest assured plaque is forming in his arteries – you don't need a test. The longer you are in this condition the worse the plaque buildup is going to be. This is not rocket science. His autopsy showed a number of significantly clogged arteries which seemed to surprise his doctor and other "experts." Apparently they forgot to take Plaque 101 in medical school.

By the time Russert's weight problem had progressed to the point of diabetes a major intervention should have been done. He should have been read the riot act. He should have been told that his higher blood sugar would now be caramelizing (cementing) his arteries and vital organs, like spilling sugary syrup on the counter and letting it turn hard – and that sooner or later something would certainly break.

He should have been told that his excessive abdominal fat clearly predicts that his liver and kidneys look more like a piece of bacon than lean beef. He should have been told that his low HDL cholesterol was due to free radical damage, meaning his lipids were being oxidized in his blood from some form of toxin or stress (such as oxidized adrenaline). He should have been told that this same problem will "cook" the fat that is marbleizing his liver and eventually make it look like a piece of overcooked meat.

He should have been told that his fat stomach was now his worst enemy, cranking out more inflammatory signals on a daily basis than any other stress he was under. He should have been told that the outsides of his arteries were also getting fat, and this excess fat was recruiting macrophages to the outer lining of his arteries that were in turn forming abnormal inflammatory gangs along his arteries that were going to drastically alter the function of his arteries.

His doctor should have scared the hell out of him because behavior changes in men seldom take place unless there is adequate pain. And then he should have given him the facts of the simple solution "Tim, all you have to do is get in a healthy pattern where you lose 20% of your weight, at which point your risk factor for a heart attack drops to close to zero. Then, if you keep losing 1-2 pounds a month you will maintain this very low risk pattern while you are getting back in shape. In fact, by losing the weight you can go a long way towards reversing all of these problems."

He should have been told that his real risk for a heart attack was based on his overall inflammation burden (wear and tear), and that if he managed this trend well he would have much less risk of any problem. He needed to start by managing his weight, because that was a major source of inflammation. He needed to make sure he got enough sleep at night to recover from wear and tear. And he really needed to watch his work load as pushing himself into the ground was no longer a safe option.

Of course I do not know what conversations took place between Russert and his doctor, but considering that his doctor is also overweight it probably wasn't anything like the above and it certainly wasn't effective. What Russert's doctor did was what virtually all doctors do in this country; they pull out the Big Pharma tool box and begin aggressively treating numbers on paper instead of the patient in front of them.

Sure we can say that Russert's problems were self inflicted. But why then do we need doctors? Don't doctors have an obligation to do everything in their power to help a person get well? Or are doctor's nothing more than part of the Big Pharma drug cartel?

The Cardiovascular Drug Quagmire

Drugs buy you time if you are lucky. The problem with cardiovascular drugs that make numbers look better on paper is that they make your health worse the longer you use them – and your Big Pharma-trained doctors expect you to use them forever. It was quite clear back in February of this year, when the ACCORD trial turned in dismal results, that the greater the number of cardiovascular drugs given to a diabetic to manage his condition the more likely he was to die.

Russert's doctor said he was taking a statin even though his cholesterol wasn't high. Yes, this is now standard medical care. Anyone at risk gets their cholesterol system placed in a statin straightjacket. This is one of the dumbest things you would ever want to do, since cholesterol synthesis is the foundation of survival in your body. The American Heart Association actively promotes this fraud at considerable profit for its bedfellows with consequent death for many Americans.

Tim Russert is a great example proving that statins are useless – and likely dangerous. Statins are now proven to activate a gene called atrogin-1, a gene that is abnormal to activate and directly damages muscle. This reduces the effectiveness of muscles to perform exercise, reducing Russert's chance of losing weight. The heart is also a muscle, meaning that statins can induce direct heart damage via atrogin-1 activation. Statins also reduce the production of coenzyme Q10, leading to cardiac malfunction.

Russert's autopsy showed his heart was enlarged, meaning it was structurally abnormal and headed in the direction of failure. This finding surprised his doctor, apparently meaning that this change in his heart was recent. Was this simply a progression of his condition or was this caused by statins? Nobody really knows, but rest assured his doctor and the general statin-prescribing community will blame his underlying health when in fact the accelerated deterioration of the heart often happens after starting statin therapy or when statin doses are raised. This is why the public needs to know what kind of statin Russert was on, what was the dose, and had it been raised in the past year. The simple fact of the case is that Russert's heart was not working well prior to the arterial clot that caused his fatal heart attack – and this means that he had less of a chance of surviving the heart attack. There is a high likelihood this handicap in heart function was the result of the statin he was taking.

There is also the plain observation that Russert did not have high cholesterol in the first place, yet his autopsy showed that he had a number of coronary arteries full of plaque. What does that say for the cholesterol theory of heart disease? It means that cholesterol numbers on paper are a near useless marker of actual health. It means that taking statins didn't make any difference to Russert at all, except in a likely adverse way. And it means that nothing effective was actually done to help him. In other words, the theory of statins and trying to lower cholesterol to abnormally low levels to prevent a heart attack, as clearly exposed by the massive Vytorin drug fraud, is a 20-billion-dollar a year racket. It is propped up by groups like the American Heart Association who will do almost anything to maintain their grip on public health, power, and money – regardless of the hundreds of thousands of Americans who die each year while receiving such treatment.

Russert was being treated for coronary artery disease, which involves the use of blood pressure medications such as beta blockers and calcium channel blockers. These medications put Russert's heart in a medical wheelchair. Maybe one day doctors will learn there is a huge difference between having good blood pressure because you are healthy and having good blood pressure numbers because you are taking medication.

Blood pressure medication restricts cardiovascular function, which means by definition that circulatory pressure and thus circulation to small blood vessels and numerous end points of circulation throughout your body is reduced. This means that nutrients and oxygen do not reach many cells and organs appropriately; creating acid pH and inflammation as an undesirable side effect. This causes many people taking these medications to become fatigued and gain weight or not be able to lose weight, a problem that is generally ignored yet directly makes the underlying cardiovascular problem worse.

In Russert' case his doctor has not disclosed his exact blood pressure medications, other than to say his blood pressure had risen recently. This likely meant he increased the dose of medication. Thus, in the months leading up to his death Russert was going all out trying to cover the elections while at the same time he was taking higher amounts of anti-energy blood pressure drugs that increased fatigue and wear and tear.

The Long Plane Flight

The straw that broke the camel's back was most likely the long plane flight Russert took as he and his family returned from a vacation to Italy the day before his death. The low cabin pressure for an extended period of time, combined with the lack of movement, places significant stress on both the circulatory and lymphatic systems. This subjected Russert to a low-oxygen pro-inflammatory stress that is known to be associated with increased clotting risk – especially in somebody who is at risk in the first place. The pro-clotting strain of that flight would persist for the next several days, at least.

Russert had a combination of factors that were not working in his favor. He had just been through months of grueling wear and tear covering the elections. Tom Brokaw reported that Russert had pushed himself too exhaustion a number of times. This means he had created a baseline of wear and tear that was pushing the inflammatory limits, a problem that tends to congest his lymphatic trash removal processes. At the same time, flying in an airplane is always a challenge to anyone's lymph system, based on changes in pressure. If there is already pre-existing lymph stagnation from wear and tear – a long airplane flight can be a real problem.

It is worth noting that blood pressure medication, especially if the dose is too high, is a significant handicap in terms of being able to tolerate the pressure changes and lower oxygen problem of a long plane flight. This is because the forced reduction in pressure by the medication causes the lymph system to lose "tone," in turn promoting even further lymph stagnation.

These problems were compounded by Russert's high level of triglycerides, which are fat blobs just sitting in his circulation. These are like Mack trucks reducing the flow of traffic – significantly compounding the pressure problem of stagnation induced by the flight along with the other wear and tear factors.

Thus, after his plane flight Russert was left in a significant pro-inflammatory and pro-clotting state. If he would have taken a few days off to rest and recover he may well be alive today. But no, he dragged his jet-lagged body out of bed, put it on a treadmill for a while (inducing further wear and tear considering the circumstances), and then went off to work. He was never to return.

The Tim Russert tragedy does have a take home message for men – wake up.

About the author: Byron J. Richards, Board-Certified Clinical Nutritionist, nationally-renowned nutrition expert, and founder of Wellness Resources is a leader in advocating the value of dietary supplements as a vital tool to maintain health. He is an outspoken critic of government and Big Pharma efforts to deny access to natural health products and has written extensively on the life-shortening and health-damaging failures of the sickness industry.

Categories
Featured Articles

Diabetes & Depression

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

TUESDAY, June 17 (HealthDay News) — The relationship between diabetes and depression apparently cuts both ways: Not only are people with treated type 2 diabetes at a heightened risk for developing depression, individuals with depression are also at risk for developing diabetes.

The research revelation suggests that both doctors and patients need to be more aware of the dual risks.

"Doctors should have their sensitivity increased toward picking up on the potential for more of their diabetes patients and more of their depression patients having susceptibility to the other disorder," said Dr. Stuart Weiss, assistant clinical professor of medicine at New York University School of Medicine.

Type 2 diabetes and clinical depression tend to go hand in hand, the study authors said, although the question has been, which comes first?

"There have been studies that show people with diabetes are twice as likely to have symptoms of depression as those who don't, and it could either be because depression itself leads to the development of type 2 diabetes or it could be that having diabetes leads to the development of depression," said study lead author Dr. Sherita Hill Golden, an associate professor of medicine and epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

"There are several studies showing that depression and depressive symptoms lead to the development of type 2 diabetes, but only a couple of studies showing that diabetes itself leads to depression. We wanted to look to see whether or not we could tease out the chicken-and-egg situation," she said.

Previous studies have also found that treating depression can help extend the lives of people with diabetes.

The authors of the new study performed two analyses, both using information from participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis trial.

The first analysis involved 5,201 individuals without type 2 diabetes at the start of the trail and found that treated type 2 diabetes was associated with a 54 percent increased risk of developing depressive symptoms over 3.2 years. Persons with untreated diabetes were not at risk of developing depression.

Interestingly, people with pre-diabetes or untreated diabetes were about 25 percent less likely to develop depressive symptoms than people with normal fasting blood sugar levels, the researchers said.

"That was a little bit of a surprise," Golden said. The study authors aren't sure why this was so, but suggest that maybe the monitoring associated with treating diabetes might contribute to depression.

The second analysis included 4,847 participants and found that elevated depressive symptoms were associated with a 42 percent greater likelihood of developing diabetes during the follow-up period. The stronger the depressive symptoms, the higher the chance of developing diabetes. After adjusting for such factors as being overweight, not exercising and smoking, the risk of developing diabetes was still 34 percent higher in patients with depression.

"Those with depression are more likely to consume more calories, be less physically active and are more likely to smoke, so they just have poor overall health behaviors in general," Golden said. "That seems to be one component of treating depression that needs to be addressed."

The findings, published in the June 18 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association, indicate that integration of care may be helpful to these patients, Golden said.

"For people who are being treated for symptoms of depression, it's important also to think about some treatment modalities that can also help them adopt healthy behaviors," she said. "And certainly among people who have treated diabetes and who are at risk of developing depression, we need to be aware of that increased risk."

Golden serves on the Merck & Co.'s clinical diabetes advisory board; the study was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health.

Categories
Featured Articles

Mosquitoes

by Andrea Dessoffy

These days it seems you can't go outside without being attacked by a swarm of gnats or mosquitoes.

You can swat them or dodge them, but these mosquitoes, gnats and other bothersome bugs don't seem to be going anywhere.

Terre Haute resident Mary Lou Toll said, "They can go home now. they're everywhere." Flood victim Gary Brandt said, "They're going in your mouth, and your ears and everywhere else."

Standing water from the floods has created the perfect breeding ground.

For Ellie Oliver, that breeding ground is right across the street.

She says, "I've sprayed my house inside and out with bug spray, but even when I went to bed the other day the gnats felt like they were swimming around my pillow."

While certainly bothersome and abundant, health officials say mosquitoes breeding on big pools of water from the floods aren't necessarily the mosquitoes you need to worry about.

Joni Foulkes of the Vigo County Health Department said, "The main threat with mosquitoes is West Nile virus, and the mosquito that carries West Nile is a container breeder mosquito."

That means containers holding small amounts of water like bird baths, old tires, and buckets should be emptied.

So far no West Nile has been found in the Wabash Valley, but health officials urge you to take precautions.

Foulkes said, "Use an insect repellent, try to avoid going outside between dusk and dawn, wear long sleeves and pants if possible."

The county's trying to combat the creatures as well, sending five trucks out a night to spray mosquitoes.

As for those never-ending gnats?

Foulkes said, "They breed by the millions and they are not a health risk but they sure are a pest."

Health officials recommend using an insect repellent with deet.

They also say if you develop any symptoms of West Nile like fever or headaches after being bitten see a doctor.