(NaturalNews) There are several political issues that are important to understand as the government erodes our rights to do anything about the issues regarding food irradiation and vitamin regulation.
Right to Free Speech (First Amendment)
With legislation like The Radicalization of Homegrown Terrorist Prevention Act of 2007 (HR 1955 and SB 1959), it may soon be considered terrorism if one disseminates any truth (or ideology). Even though corporations are protected by the first amendment to the point where they can outright lie (as the Mainstream Media routinely does), citizens will not be allowed to even state facts. These laws will be selectively enforced so radio talk show hosts can still promote violence against those questioning the 9-11 Commission report (to say that dissent is treason is pure Communism). Losing the first amendment means ordinary citizens may soon no longer be able to even inform others that their food has been poisoned. This is of course to protect poison manufacturers who have paid off members of Congress. Recently You Tube has implemented its own version of the bill, censoring many videos, for which we can thank Senator Joe Lieberman. Note that the first amendment is in order of importance.
Right to Bear Arms (Second Amendment)
Currently in the U.S. one in 99 Americans are in prison, the highest incarceration rate of any country (let alone a "free" one). Most prisoners are there for petty, victimless crimes like substance abuse or possession of marijuana, yet states are quickly changing laws to turn civil infractions into criminal infractions, imposing serious jail time for things like driving offenses. Once in jail, prisoners effectively become slaves to the corporations, working for about 30 cents per hour, while supported by the tax payers. At the same time, states are changing gun requirements to not only disallow convicted felons, but anyone even charged with a misdemeanor (adjudication withheld). Thus in some states you can't obtain a gun license for five years after being essentially just charged with reckless driving, something any police officer can charge you with on a whim. Hence, being charged with a misdemeanor can be treated as a conviction of a felony. So it's a two step process of: a) make everyone a criminal and b) take away the rights of criminals. Losing the second amendment ultimately means people won't be able to protect their property or their gardens from thieves. The second amendment is the fail safe mechanism of the first.
Right to Privacy (Fourth Amendment)
Citizens used to have protection against unlawful search and seizure of their property. In order to obtain a search warrant, police used to have to convince an impartial (not insider) judge that they had probable (not improbable) cause to believe a crime was being committed. Probable cause means it is probably true (more than 51% odds). However, since the "War on Boogeymen" began, U.S. citizens basically no longer have fourth amendment protection. Now, just like the British police did in the 1700's (causing our forefathers to enact the fourth amendment in the first place), U.S. police and government officials can "sneak and peak" into homes, tamper with or fabricate evidence, derive evidence from torture, and present the evidence in court, all because they suspect someone might be a "terrorist" (an undefined term). This is to make us safer.
Those put in jail no longer have a right to a speedy trial and we no longer have the writ of Habeas Corpus (Latin for "I have the body"). This means police officers (who often act as collection agents for multinational corporations) no longer have to prove they even still have the prisoner in good health. Losing our privacy and right to a fair trial means the government (i.e. their corporate masters) can eliminate anyone who opposes their agenda (i.e. profits). Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely. While the government can detain indefinitely any limo drivers who taxi around bad guys, impeachment of proven liars and war criminals in the White House is "off the table".
Guarding your Garden
The U.S. government now reserves the right to search any property, destroy any garden, seize any produce, and possibly one day charge any farmer with a crime of "unlawful cultivation of a prescribed food", even if it means his own family will starve. Combine this with the fact that the government now aims to irradiate (poison) much of our food supply, and soon people may have no ability to heal or even feed themselves with food containing any living enzymes. This essentially condemns everyone to eat only fast food.
Since all produce may soon be considered dangerous, it's only a matter of time before some newscaster refers to garden vegetables themselves as "Homegrown Terror". Citizens will have to deal fresh vegetables like drugs. Police representing the United Nations and NAFTA interests will search for secret indoor gardens based on power consumption. Shameless neighbors facing foreclosure and anxious to collect reward money will peek over fences and call police hot-lines when they see vegetables growing, turning in anyone committing an "act of agriculture".
Whether new legislation says it's alright or not, according to Natural Law and the Constitution the government has no right to control the food supply. The Declaration of Independence makes it clear in the first paragraph: Whenever any form of government becomes oppressive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. Corporate control of the food supply is exactly the kind of tyranny the forefathers were trying to protect us from.
During the seven years that have passed since 9/11, many have justified their own complacency by saying "As long as you aren't doing anything illegal, why do you care if the government (does)?" Those people should now take note that growing and consuming vegetables may one day be considered illegal.
"This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes." -Morpheus, The Matrix
For those of you are still under the illusion that the Democrats and Republicans are two distinct political parties, wait and watch as the destruction of America unfolds under the watch of these two sister political criminal cartels. If either party this past 40 years or so had not been bought and owned by the money changers and lords of ‘finance’, our country would not be on the precipice of total collapse as it is today. These two political entities are simply flip-sides of the same 30 pieces of silver and have committed treason against the People of America, our Constitution and against God Himself.
For guidance in most policy matters, both major party candidates are members of and tap into the ‘Big Three’ one world government insider groups, The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), The Tri-Lateral Commission, and The Bilderberg Group. John McCain and Barack Obama are both members of the CFR. McCain’s foreign policy advisor is Max Boot who is a CFR editor. He was endorsed by Alexander Haig, a CFR member from the Nixon era. Robert Kagan is an informal foreign policy advisor and a member of CFR who co-founded the Project For the New American Century. The consummate CFR insider from the Republican Party side of the coin, Henry Kissinger is a McCain advisor, as well as other informal advisors and CFR members such as Colin Powell, James Schlesinger, George Shultz and R. James Woolsey.
One of Obama’s top advisors, Zbigniew Brzezinski, has also been called “the consummate insider’ on the Democrat party side and is an open proponent of Marxism and a one world government. He is Obama’s foreign affairs advisor and is a CFR member and co-founder of The Trilateral Commission, serving as Director from 1973-1976. Obama’s wife Michelle is on the Board of Directors for The Chicago Council on Global Affairs which was founded in 1922 as The Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. Obama’s economic advisor is Austan Goolsbee who is a member of Skull & Bones (Remember the Bushes, John Kerry and others?), Class of 1991. Four other advisors are Senior Fellows with The Brookings Institute: Ivo Daalder, Philip Gordon, Susan Rice and Bruce Reidel.
Following is a short article about who Zbigniew Brzezinski really is, which is a barometer on who Barack Obama and John McCain really are.
Ben Taylor
******* YOUR NEW PRESIDENT, ZBIG BROTHER by Alan Stang October 29, 2008
The purpose of this modest piece is to reassure you. Stop tormenting yourself. Further self-flagellation is pointless. Your next President has already been selected. Didn’t you know? Sure, go ahead and vote if you like, if you have nothing else to do, if you don’t mind standing in long lines between Obamatron zombies and McCrud morons, but enjoy the reassurance of knowing that the powers above Ponzi Paulson and Helicopter Ben Bernanke and Co. have already made their choice.
He is Zbigniew Brzezinski. What? Who? Is this some kind of Polish joke? Sadly, it is not.
In 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote a book entitled Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York, Viking Press). Let’s browse through it to find out what Zbigniew is. Zbig dedicates the book to Ian, Mark and Mika, his kids. A nice touch, don’t you think? He’s a family man. Starting on page 72 he explains “why Marxism represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing of man’s universal vision.”
Marxism is “a victory of reason over belief. . . . To a greater extent than any previous mode of political thinking, Marxism puts a premium on the systematic and rigorous examination of material reality and on guides to action derived from that examination.”
Page 83: Marxism “represented a major advance in man’s ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world.” It carried “an essentially ethical message.” It “was derived from a totally rational method of inquiry.” P. 123: Marxism “provided a unique intellectual tool for understanding and harnessing the fundamental forces of our time. . . . it supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality; it infused political action with strong ethical elements . . . .”
Zbig became David Rockefeller's prime minister. In 1973, under David’s direction, Zbig formed the Trilateral Commission, which is the foreign ministry of the Council on Foreign Relations, a preeminent founder of which was Marxist Edward M. House.
In 1976, Zbig and David literally interviewed dour peanut farmer Jimmy Carter at David’s Tarrytown estate. They liked what they heard and installed Democrat Jimmy as President of the United States. From the beginning, Jimmy was a Rockefeller factotum. Zbig Brother was his National Security Adviser. Jimmy came close to wrecking our economy. Okay, but what does all this have to do with the 2008 campaign?
In the 2000 campaign, Zbigniew Brzezinski, lifelong Marxist, was foreign policy adviser to Senator John McCain, who said this: “I am honored that Zbigniew Brzezinski will join my foreign policy team. As a former national security adviser and a highly respected foreign policy expert, his broad experience makes him an invaluable asset to my team.” So Zbig went from Democrat Jimmy to Republican John. Remember that at the top – above the candidates – you have one party with two branches.
What about this year? This year, Zbig is back, running foreign policy for Barack Hussein Obama. Indeed, remember Mark, son of Zbig? Mark was one of the sons to whom Zbig dedicated Between Two Ages in 1970. Mark is all grown up now and shaving. Can you imagine? Mark is foreign policy adviser to Senator Hussein. So who is foreign policy adviser to Senator McCain this year? The envelope please! El Senador Juan McCain’s foreign policy adviser this year is Ian Brzezinski, the other Zbigniew son. Lifelong Marxist Zbigniew Brzezinski – David Rockefeller’s Prime Minister – controls both sides of the forthcoming charade through his sons. Again, you can relax. It really makes no difference who wins.
It is not my intent to be an alarmist unnecessarily, but it is time to get ourselves prepared for some possibly very difficult times ahead. The financial mess fomented by the criminal actions of international banks and the foolish spending practices of ‘governments’ (especially the United States) has created the probability for a worldwide economic collapse such as the world has not seen since the Great Depression of the 1920s- maybe the worst ever.
It may be too late to buy any metals of value as a hedge against the collapse of paper currency, but it is not too late to buy a stockpile of food. Every family should have as much dry beans and rice as can be stored. Both are available now in 25 and 50 pound bags, but if there is a run on the available food supplies, it will be rationed by the government. I for one do not want my survival and the survival of my family to depend on the very people who caused this catastrophe. By now everyone should know that the government cannot be depended on for very much.
Our focus should be primarily on those foods that are not immediately perishable, such as the above mentioned rice and beans and also a supply of canned goods. Pasta can be easily stored and has a good shelf life also and is available in large bags. We should all have as much water as we can store. The best preservative would be Ionic Colloidal Silver ; it is more stable in chlorinated water than particle silver and will purify water more safely than chlorine.
It is also wise to have a stock of colloidal silver to boost the immune system, especially in the event of viral epidemics. Nothing works better against food poisoning and it is also the best thing available for infections from cuts.
Most who have spent time camping in the wild know that one of the things often unappreciated until needed is toilet paper. Paper products of all kinds could be in short supply, so don’t let yourself get caught having to use corn cobs or catalogs.
Last but not of least importance is weapons and ammunition. Everyone should have a handgun for quick self defense because if things get really bad and food supplies get short, the criminal element will not be contained. We all have seen what happens in large cities with the problems of looting at almost any excuse. There simply will not be enough ‘law enforcement’ to protect everyone; that task will be up to the individual. During the great depression of the 20s, about 80% of the population was rural and somewhat self-sustaining, but now that number has flip-flopped, creating a situation of much greater potential danger. The past 50 years has seen a breakdown of the moral fabric of America to the point where I believe that most major cities have a 100,000 or more people who will turn to crime at the drop of a hat. If food is in short supply, cities won’t be good place to have your families.
Just as essential is the ability to hunt if one is able to get to a rural area. A small bore rifle (.22 caliber) is best for small game and a larger game rifle (such as a .223, .270, 30-30, etc.) should also be available. One of the most efficient tools is a shotgun (12 gauge or 16 gauge) for small game and bird hunting. Shotguns are also good for self defense at close range. It is likely that ammo will be in short supply if you procrastinate.
I would recommend after stocking up on these items, leave them untouched until you absolutely need them. Continue to purchase what you require daily as you need it and save your ‘food and ammo stash’ until you have no choice but to use them.
Prophesy is not my forte’, but even a foolish man should be able to see the possibility of what this economic mess could bring, so make an effort to be ready as best you can. We will stay open as long as colloidal silver can be produced and shipped, but there are no guarantees that anyone can make about what is to come. Good luck and may God’s providence be with us.
While Americans bury their heads in the sand, all-out war is being waged against her, not only by criminal International banking cartels, but by so-called trading partners, such as China.
If the unadulterated truth were known, the gangster financiers and their multi-national corporations are at the root of the poison foods and tainted products coming out of China and China is more than happy to accommodate them. America is being systemically dismantled by these companies, most of which were birthed and founded in the USA.
The industrial infrastructure has been moved out of the USA to other parts of the world-particularly China where labor is some of the cheapest available. The fact that labor is cheap in China is not inherently evil, but most of the labor in China is tantamount to slavery for the benefit of ‘the state’ and their multinational business partners. Although the Chinese people may realize some degree of benefit over what their lifestyle would be without ‘commerce’ with America, within China, the government is the real beneficiary of this massive transfer of wealth. Most of that wealth increase is not going to the Chinese citizen on the street, but directly into the coffers of a very evil government who is pumping massive quantities of that wealth into arms and arms technology. Is there anyone out there who doesn’t understand that the target of this arms build-up is America?
The irony here is glaring. American wealth and prosperity has been used to build the economic foundation of a nation (China) who is then using that financial benefit to turn around and attack the very source of their new found prosperity. But, I place less blame on those evil entities and regimes that want to destroy us than I do on the greedy politicians, both Democrat and Republican, in America who are willing to sell out their country for thirty pieces of silver or less. What we see being manifest here is closely akin to the fable about “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs”.
China is not only attacking America by way of imported products, but also by virtue of massive investments into our economy. Although it may appear that it wouldn’t be in their interest for these investments to fail, their goal is much more sinister than making money. The real goal is to own America whatever its condition may be and ‘investment’ means ‘ownership’. She would then be rebuilt in the image of the owner.
Tainted products range from poison pet food to lead paint in children’s toys and there is probably no way for importers to police everything item being manufactured in China and shipped here and I don’t think most of the multi-national importers want to spend the money it would take to filter all these products out of the market place. Americans had better wake up from this propaganda induced lethargy (i.e. “Oh, there simply can’t be any such thing as such a broad-based conspiracy to destroy America.”) or the poor and middle class of the whole world is going to suffer an economic calamity, the purpose of which is to usher in a One World Global Federalism.
But back to the subject of the Chinese angle to this multi-faceted attack; the following article(s) document some of this “attack” against America. Please read and wake-up before it’s too late- if it isn’t already.
Has China Declared War Against America? article from: Health Truth Revealed
It started with pet food contaminated with melamine. There were reports of pets all over the country dying from kidney failure. Now, we're discovering that melamine is in literally thousands of products all over the world that humans consume from baby food, to pigs, to wheat gluten, to rice protein, to candy. Ironically, it's all coming from China.
If a problem like this were isolated to one product and the manufacturer was caught it would be one thing. When something as serious as we're now finding effects so many different consumable products, it can no longer be passed off as an accident or a simple mistake. This appears to be a silent method of warfare, and food is the weapon our enemies have chosen.
Perhaps all those drum beats during the opening ceremony of the Olympics had far more to do with being the drum beats of war than a ceremony to open a sporting event. Check out all the stories and clips for yourself posted below about the level and depth of the melamine contamination and draw your own conclusions. If this isn't bioterrorism, what else would you call it?
The possibly Apocalyptic economic crisis that America now faces has not happened simply by chance. We have been brought to this precipice by the careful and cunning calculation of evil men whose goal is to destroy America and bring her to economic collapse so that we can then be integrated into the one world government spoken of in Bible prophesy.
The end result of this usury money system has been forecast by astute men almost since the birth of this Nation. The battle against ‘central banks’ owned by a private international banking cartel was a battle being waged prior to and immediately after America declared and won her independence. This was more the trigger to the American Revolution than was “taxation without representation”, but these facts have been carefully edited out of American history books.
These money changers and manipulators had already controlled the economies and hence the governments of Europe, in part or ‘in toto’ for several hundred years. They were not inclined to permit the building of a new nation with the natural resources of America without having their greedy fingers in the pie.
They had worked at perfecting their ‘craft’ and consolidating their power in Europe since the Middle Ages when they had gained great wealth via their control of the northern “silk road” trade routes going from the Orient to Europe north of the Caspian and Black Seas. Over time they became the primary gold and silver merchants of Europe, subsequently establishing the earliest banking cartels in Europe, loaning money to both sides of most European conflicts since the Middle Ages. Through this practice of not publicly taking sides, but funding both sides, they were able to have their fingers in both sides of this proverbial pie and eventually gained enough monetary influence to even instigate wars for their own personal gain.
By the time of world-wide European explorations, this criminal enterprise and its various branches had become the banking system of Europe. They were not only masters of money and economics, but of political intrigue and infiltration, usually knowing more about what was about to happen in a nation before that nation’s people knew. They have been successful because their vision and planning transcends time and location. I believe that this is only possible if there is a controlling intellect whose lifespan also transcends time and space. The evidence is clear that this criminal syndicate is none other than the economic system that we are warned about in the Bible, where no man will be able to buy or sell without ‘the mark’ of this system and its’ master “the beast”.
After the founding of the American Republic, it took over 100 years before these banking gangsters (banksters) finally bought off enough Congressmen to get the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 passed. Although they already had much influence in America prior to that time because of the shear volume of their wealth, they had not yet consolidated their power until this Act passed in 1913. Since that time the fate of our nation has been sealed by the greed of politicians and the blindness of the American People, especially the Christian Church, who had 2000 years and more of warning, but heeded it not. What we are observing now simply may be the death of the American Republic. May God help us; it is now in His hands.
Please take time to watch this video. When it is over, you will understand more than the average person does about how and why our Nation is on the verge of economic collapse.
Money As Debt
In the central Bank, Jackson found a concrete focus for all his fears of aristocratic subversion—fears he shared with many citizens. “I was aware that the Bank question would be disapproved by all the sordid, and interested, who prised self interest more than the perpetuity of our liberty, and the blessings of a free republican government,” he confided shortly after the annual message. “This monied aristocracy” was everywhere at work, buying up voters and lawmakers and “silencing opposition, by its corrupting influence, & preparing for a renewal of its charter, which I viewed as the death blow to our liberty.”
The recipient of this disclosure was none other than James Alexander Hamilton, son of the late Treasury secretary and himself a federal district attorney and Jackson confidant. Hamilton had helped craft the passage opposing recharter in the annual message. Now, at Jackson's prompting, he prepared a detailed critique, arraying objections to the Bank under two heads. The Bank was unconstitutional, because Congress had no power to charter corporations and withdraw them from the regulatory and taxing power of the states. (This was the Jeffersonian position, which the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Marshall had rejected in the landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819.) The Bank was also dangerous to liberty, because its concentrated power gave it a “fearful influence” over citizens' lives and an unchecked sway over government, inviting corruption and oppression.
Jackson copied Hamilton's headings into his private memorandum book. Over the next two years, he recopied and reworked his bill of particulars, always under the same two heads: The Bank was unconstitutional, and it was dangerous to liberty. [He could not have been more right.] Meanwhile, the question of re-charter simmered. In his 1830 and 1831 annual messages, Jackson reiterated his opposition to the Bank. He proposed in its stead a wholly government institution—in name a bank, but in effect an arm of the Treasury, without power to make loans, acquire property, or issue notes.
In 1832, President Jackson vetoed the move to renew the charter of the 'Bank of the United States' (a central bank controlled by the international bankers). In 1836 the bank went out of business.
The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation.
He wrote:
"The bold effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had produced…are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the establishment of another like it."
Andrew Jackson had at least two attempts made on his life. So proud and intent on warning the future generations was he that his tombstone is inscribed with the phrase "I killed the bank!"
It came back.
The Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics, but as Congressman Charles Lindberg Sr. warned Congress:
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth…the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized."
Even as early as 1916 President Woodrow Wilson was saying:
"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world–no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small amount of dominant men."
No more stinging condemnation of a concept can be given than by the man who, convinced it was for the good, championed it in the first place!
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist”. — Marcus Cicero, speaking to Caesar, Crassus, Pompey and the Roman Senate.
“The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of the Bank of the United States [The Federal Reserve System].” — G. Edward Griffin, The Creature from Jekyll Island, American Opinion Publishing, p. 331.
“Over the years since Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the Manchester textile manufacturer, had bought cotton from the Southern states, The Rothschilds had developed heavy American commitments. Nathan… had made loans to various states of the Union, had been, for a time, the official European banker for the U.S. government and was a pledged supporter of the Bank of the United States.” — Derek Wilson, Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty, Charles Scribner’s Sons, p. 178.
“The Rothschilds long had a powerful influence in dictating American financial laws. The law records show that they were the power in the old Bank of the United States.” — Gustavus Myers, History of the Great American Fortunes, Random House, p. 556.
Mayer Rothschild said: “Let me issue and control a nation’s money and I care not who writes the laws….”
Thomas Jefferson has this to say about the central bank.
“A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace to the liberties of the people than a standing army… We must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt.” — Ibid. p. 329.
Jefferson also wrote:
"The [privately-owned] Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution… if the American people allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
“President Andrew Jackson had earned the undying hatred of monetary scientists, both in America and abroad. It is not surprising, therefore, that on January 30, 1835, an assassination attempt was made against him. Miraculously, both pistols of the assailant misfired, and Jackson was spared by a quirk of fate. It was the first such attempt to be made against the life of a President of the United States. The would-be assassin was Richard Lawrence who either was truly insane or who pretended to be insane to escape harsh punishment. At any rate, Lawrence was found not guilty due to insanity. Later, he boasted to friends that he had been in touch with powerful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from punishment should he be caught.” — Ibid. p. 357.
Even Abraham Lincoln shared Jefferson's view of the private bankers. In order to finance the Civil War, he approached the New York bankers to see about getting a loan for the North. The interest rates they proposed were in the order of 30%. Lincoln's response was akin to; "stuff it." He then had Congress live up to its Constitutional responsibility for issuing and valuing currency and issued his famous greenbacks. Incredibly, like so many of us, even to the heights of power, Lincoln didn't know at first that he had the OPTION, let alone the probably-intended OBLIGATION to create money for the nation. With the civil war ending, he had come to the conclusion that his government issued currency should become the basis of the re-United States monetary system. Within a matter of weeks he was shot in the Ford theatre with his monetary system dying with him.
President John F. Kennedy
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended –
(a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
"(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption," and
(b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
SEC. 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
In 1963, President John Kennedy wanted an end to the Federal Reserve System, which had a strangle-hold on the United States and virtually the world. By a simple stroke of the pen, President Kennedy dismissed the Federal Reserve System and ordered the U.S. government to restore its Constitutional-mandate of controlling the money. President Kennedy was dead three weeks later. When President Lyndon Johnson took office, he immediately rescinded Kennedy's order and the Federal Reserve won another round.
Representative Charles A. Lindberg, Sr., the father of the famous aviator, was a member of the Banking and Currency Committee. He opposed the Federal Reserve Act and gave a speech on January 20, 1915. "The system is private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people's money, and in the interest of the stockholders and those allied with them." Representative Louis T. McFadden, chairman of the Housing Banking and Currency Committee, stated on June 10,1932, "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies that prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders."
Foreign Bankers Own Majority of the Federal Reserve
More that half the shareholdings in the Federal Reserve Bank arc controlled by large New York City banks, including National City Bank, National Bank of Commerce, First National Bank, Chase National Bank, and Marine National Bank. When Rockefeller's National City Bank merged with J.P. Morgan's First National Bank in 1955, the Rockefeller group owned 22 percent of the shares of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which in turn holds the majority of shares in the Federal Reserve System – 53 percent. But who really owns what? Here are the primary stockholders of the Federal Reserve Bank:
1. Rothchild banks of London and Berlin.
2. Lazard Brothers Banks of Paris.
3. Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy.
4. Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam.
5. Lehman Brothers Bank of New York.
6. Kuhn, Loeb bank of New York.
7. Chase Manhattan Bank of New York, which controls all of the other 11 Federal Reserve Banks.
8. Goldman, Sachs Bank of New York.
This ownership combination has been challenged by the Federal Reserve Bank, but a study of Standards and Poors will verify the ownerships. This means that the controlling interest of our national monetary system is foreign. In 1797, John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson, "All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise, not from defects of the Constitution or Confederation; not from any want of honor or virtue, as much as downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation." In simple terms, the United States Government borrows money from the Federal Reserve Bank with interest. Here is how it works: The Government wants $1 billion. The Federal Reserve prints $1 billion – based upon no hard asset – and lends it to the Government at a high interest rate. The bank did not have the original money, it created it and made a bookkeeping entry – like you writing yourself a check without funds and cashing it. The Federal Reserve controls the flow of money, making it tight and creating unemployment or printing more than actually exists and creates inflation. It is, in essence, a paper corporation, which controls the entire economic well-being of the nation.
Conclusion
No Congress, no President has been strong enough to stand up to the foreign-controlled Federal Reserve Bank. Yet there is a catch – one that President Kennedy recognized before he was slain – the original deal in 1913 creating the Federal Reserve Bank had a simple back out clause. The investors loaned the United States Government $1 billion. And the back out clause allows the United States to buy out the system for that $1 billion. If the Federal Reserve Bank were demolished and the Congress of the United States took control of the currency, as required in the Constitution, the National Debt would virtually end overnight, and the need for more taxes and even the income tax, itself. Thomas Jefferson was concise in his early warning to the American nation, "If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Many who agree with me on a lot of other issues, do not understand my enthusiasm for gold and sound money or why I spend so much time studying and talking about monetary policy. It's true that I talk about money differently than most, but the fact is sound money offers many benefits. For example – peace.
Can sound money really bring about peace? Actually, it plays a big part in peaceful international relationships. Money based on commodities, rather than paper, is not subject to government manipulation, and is a key component to free and honest trade. History shows that if countries engage in trade with each other, their governments tend to find ways to get along for the same reason you do not kill your customers at your place of business, even if they occasionally annoy you. If someone outright cheats you, however, you may engage in “war” by taking them to court, for example, and the relationship will sour. Governments and central banks with unfettered power to manipulate currency also have the ability to cheat their creditors. One way they do this is to simply create enough currency to pay off debts. This devalues the currency and “cheats” the recipient out of what they are owed. It would not be fair if you watered down your product the way our government waters down its currency, so it is not hard to understand, in these simplified terms, why loose monetary policy contributes so much to ill will and war around the world.
Sound money, on the other hand, simply is what it is. Removing governmental power to manipulate money, removes the temptation for government to spend, print and cheat. Sound money ensures that our government’s spending priorities would be brought into sharp focus and reduced to only what we can afford.
Sound money also limits the ability to wage wars of aggression. Imagine how much more careful Washington would have to be about starting a war if they did not have this financial sleight of hand at their disposal! Fiat currency allows government do expensive things they should not be doing while paying the bills with cheap money. The Federal Reserve has lately been auctioning off large amounts of treasury bills as a way to finance the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and our crushing entitlement burden. The resulting devaluation of the dollar is quickly eroding our image as a good trading partner in the world. As a consequence, there is therefore more talk of economic isolation and war.
This vicious cycle of spending, fighting and inflating is not what Americans want. It is what the government wants, and it has had to deceive the citizens into allowing and supporting it. Sound money curbs the government’s ability to engage in these shenanigans and reduces the wars we fight to only truly defensive ones, for which Americans are more than willing to stand and fight. So in these ways, sound money is very conducive to peace.
The ruling by a Federal Judge in Connecticut that dentist Dr. Mark Breiner may exercise his “Right to Freedom of Speech” by advertising and advocating mercury-free dentistry in any public forum, and state why they are such a health risk is certainly a step in the “Right" direction.
The problem is, when and how did we ever get to a place where we had to have a federal judge give us an OK to exercise our Right to free speech about scientific facts? And it is a known fact and there is no debate within the scientific community that mercury is one of the most toxic metals on planet Earth, but this ‘fact of science’ seems to just disappear when the American Dental Association (ADA) is brought into the room.
How the heck do supposedly ‘intelligent’ people become completely brain dead on such a no-brainer topic? That question is mostly rhetorical and I’m not trying to answer it here, but I’ll bet it can be traced back to who funds the ADA and dental schools. We already know how big pharmaceutical company money has corrupted the American Medical Association (AMA) and medical schools by their grants from their inception. Throughout the history of mankind, there have always been influence peddlers and power brokers who believe it in their interest to control the words and actions of all other men. Those power brokers inevitably gain control by the illicit use of their money of people in the public and politic arenas. That is simply a given. Our Nation’s Founders knew that from the beginning of our Republic and repeatedly warned us about “government” that falls under corrupt influences. completely ignore your Rights, unless you are willing to go to the mat with them in asserting those Rights.
Delving into where the corruption by money comes from is not my point here, so I’ll get right to the real issue with my comments. My point is about exercising your Rights. Every man and woman has an absolute God-given, unalienable, and non-negotiable Right to state their opinions and beliefs and it should go without saying, “That Right” certainly extends to stating widely accepted scientific facts! We can’t stop those who would steal our Rights by “going along to get along”, by not “rocking the boat”, by trying to be “good citizens”, by obeying every “Right stealing statute” that government throws at us. The only option is that we must belligerently assert our Rights as Free Men and Women!
Make no mistake about it, the current system which is largely controlled by special money interests will try its damnedest to steamroll right over you if you even think about standing up to their machine. Exercise your Rights! Live as Free Men and Women and , ignore anyone who would harness your freedom of thought, as well as your voice! Remember, you need not check with “the state”, that includes and is not limited to any agency or judge, before you exercise your rights. There are only two choices, use your Rights or loose your Rights! If you have time also read the article below.
To be a Free People, we must understand, not only our Rights as given to us by God, but we must also understand to what extent and under what circumstances we may loose these Rights. Contrary to the philosophies and practices of tyranny that pervade our "legal" and "judicial" system today, no court, no "government" agency, no other Man or Woman, nor any other group of Men or Women has any arbitrary Right to infringe upon our individual God-given Rights.
No court may proceed with any actions, whether hearings or trial involving a Man or Woman endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights unless personal dominion and de jure jurisdiction over them is proved by the Plaintiffs and the court proceeding against them or unless you agree by contract that you are willingly, voluntarily, and knowingly, with full disclosure, agreeing to said jurisdiction and process.
Even then, there are limitations on the Rights that can be relinquished by the People. Once a Right is Given by God, it is a Right retained forever, being, not only an unalienable Right, but also a non-negotiable Right, meaning, if God has given it to me I cannot give it away or even allow it to be infringed by another Man or entity, …except in the event that I myself have infringed upon the Life, Liberty and/or Property of another Man or Woman. If I commit such an infringement against another Man and it is proven, I then may have relinquished the Rights that God gave me. This is the foundation of Mosaic Law and the legal principle upon which this Nation was inspired into existence by Almighty God. Contrary to the teaching of some, God is not a Tyrant, but rather is, not only the founder of, but the number one practitioner of, the concept of "free moral agency". The Creator of the Universe has two basic rules, 1) that we honor Him and 2) that we respect the Rights that he gave to other Men and Women.
Many people and especially many persons of "government" would have us believe that our various Constitutions, both National and of the "several states" grant us certain Rights. That is simply a presumption of ignorance in some cases and an outright lie in other cases. Our state and National Constitutions were never intended to grant, define, or limit the Rights of the People; these documents are for the purpose of putting "chains" on the government's power and ability to infringe upon those individual God-given unalienable and non-negotiable Rights. When viewed through this prism of "Truth", one's understanding will take on a meaning of the relationship between God, Man and "governments of Man". The Founders of this Nation understood and accepted these Axioms upon which they strove to found a new Nation within which Men would be free from the Tyranny of other Men. Most of us have either forgotten these Truths or have permitted others desiring power and control over our lives to convince us that there is some other way that must be followed. They lie.
The following is a condensed "Memorandum of Law" listing "Supreme Law of the Land" and legal cases/opinions showing evidence that no government entity has personal dominion and jurisdiction over your Life, Liberty, and Property, nor are the People bound or obligated to obey any such law, statute, rule, or regulation that would infringe upon their individual God-given Rights. In fact, it is our obligation to peacefully resist all such attempts by "the state", “this state”, or by any other persons to infringe upon our God-given Rights. If God cares for us enough to give us a Right, we should treasure that Right and be willing to claim and protect that Right at whatever the cost may be.
To Wit:
US Constitution, Article 6, Clause 2 (The Supremacy Clause): “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”
Marbury v. Madison 5 US 137 (1803): "No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect", “Anything that is in conflict is null and void of law", "Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the Supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law." (If any statement, within any law, which is passed, is unconstitutional, the whole law is unconstitutional.)
Mudock v. Penn. 319 US 105 (1943): "A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution and that a flat license tax here involves restraints in advance the constitutional liberties of Press and Religion and inevitably tends to suppress their existence. That the ordinance is non-discriminatory and that is applies also to peddlers of wares and merchandise is immaterial. The liberties granted by the first amendment are in a preferred position. Since the privilege in question is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution and exists independently of the states authority, the inquiry as to whether the state has given something for which it cannot ask a return is irrelevant. No state may convert any secured liberty into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it."
Byars v. US 273 USR 28 (1927): “Constitutional provisions, where the security of a person and property are to be liberally construed, and it is the duty of the courts to be watchful for the Constitutional rights of the Citizen and against any stealth encroachment therein.”
Hurtado v. California 110 US 516 (1884): “The state cannot diminish the rights of the people.”
Watson v. Memphis, 375 US 526 (1964): “Constitutional rights may not be denied simply because of hostility to their assertion and exercise. Vindication of conceded constitutional rights cannot be made dependent upon any theory that it is less expensive to deny them than to afford them.”
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 at 491 (1966): “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
Miller v. US, 230 F 486 (1913): “The claim and exercise of a Constitutional right shall not be converted into a crime.”
Wright v Georgia 373 US 284 (1964): “…one cannot be punished for failing to obey the command of an officer if the command itself is violative of the Constitution.”
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, Alabama: 373 US 262 (1962) “If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a license and a fee for it, you can ignore the license and a fee and engage the right with impunity."
Mulger v. Kansas 123 US 623 (1887): “The courts …are under a solemn duty, to look at the substance of things, whenever they enter upon the inquiry whether the legislature has transcended the limits of its authority. If, therefore, a statute purporting to have been enacted to protect the public health, the public morals, or the public safety, has no real or substantial relation to those objects, or is a palpable invasion of rights secured by the fundamental law, it is the duty of the courts to so adjudge, and thereby give effect to the Constitution.”
"The individual stands upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no duty to the state or to his neighbors to divulge his business or to open his doors to investigation, so far as it may tend to incriminate him. He owes no duty to the state since he receives nothing therefrom beyond the protection of his property and life. His rights are such as exist by the law of the land that is long antecedent to the organization of the state, and can only be taken from him by due process of the law in accordance with the Constitution. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." — United States Supreme Court, Hale vs. Hinkle 201 U.S. 43 at 74.
Since 1905, the case of Hale vs. Hinkle has been cited by the Supreme Court over 144 times and by the lower federal and state courts over 1,600 times. Hale vs. Hinckle has never been reversed . . .
According to Health Science Institute’s recent disclosure, the New York State Assembly is considering a bill which will, if enacted, require all children in the state to receive every vaccine that the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommends. Twenty vaccines – some requiring multiple doses are presently recommended.
This is very good for our 100 year health care monopoly which already accounts for 17% of GNP. If the bill passes, the producers of vaccines will have an assured market in the state of New York. Furthermore insurance companies, which are already turning the art of medicine into a business, will be able to increase health insurance premiums to take care of this new requirement.
But is this bill good for our children? What assurance do we have that these multiple injections of foreign proteins, preservatives and adjuvants are safe and effective? Considering that a NEW American disease, autism, suddenly appeared and became an epidemic after the CDC’s previous promotion of childhood vaccines, all taxpayers and especially parents should be very much concerned. It is notable that the manufacturers of vaccines are not liable for any damage that their products might cause. Our lawmakers have seen to that. If vaccines cause damage, taxpayers will pay the bills.
There are about 4000 cases pending in our courts involving damage to children allegedly caused by previously required vaccines. The first one has been decided in favor of the plaintiff. Taxpayers are obligated to pay the award – not the company whose product caused the damage. Despite these facts, incumbent lawmakers are busy insuring the profits of an industry that has already caused lots of sickness, heartbreak and inordinate expense to American parents.
Maybe the $100,000,000 per year the pharmaceutical industry spends on lobbying and campaign contributions have reduced interest in the welfare of our children. In any case the CDC should be required to prove that every vaccine which they recommend is safe and effective and also that every combination of vaccines will cause no damage.
Guardacil is one of these CDC approved vaccines. It is supposed to eliminate cervical cancer, but does not, according to Diane Harper, one of the principal investigators in Guardacil trials. It protects against 4 types of sexually transmitted human papilloma virus (HPV) according to Merck. However, HPV is easily detected and treated during annual gynecological examinations of women. HPV does not always cause cancer, but the 16 million doses of Guardacil that Merck has distributed so far has resulted in almost 10,000 adverse event reports. About 6% roughly 600 have been severe including seizures and convulsions. Also seven young women died suddenly, of unknown causes, shortly after taking the vaccine. Evidently it isn’t so effective and it isn’t exactly safe.
There are alternatives to vaccines. During the Polio Epidemic in the 1940s, Frederick Klenner, M.S., M.D., a medical scientist as well as a physician, was curing polio and practically every childhood disease with injections or infusions of sodium ascorbate (inexpensive vitamin C). Klenner knew that this vitamin is one of the few naturally anti-viral substances. None of his 60 polio patients became paralyzed and they were usually cured within 72 hours. I consider it a crime that Americans do not regularly have access to the medical technology that Klenner developed. If this technology were available there would be little need for vaccines in my opinion and that of many other informed people.
Vitamin C infusions are not part of the standards of care – probably because they are too easy. A physician told me that she had used them to cure shingles, but at the risk of losing her license and possible jail time. The medical monopoly is good at suppressing advances in medical science that are effective and inexpensive.
This is an election year! Legislators want your votes! This is a good time for taxpayers, especially those who are parents, to tell them your opinions about this bill. An alternative would be to replace incumbents with candidates more interested in the welfare of our children.
The truth is the best answer to growing government intrusion into our healthcare Rights and we all must understand the truth about the ‘quasi-corporations’ that make up what is currently masquerading as ‘our government’
Even if there were ten thousand ‘Blue Men’, the truth is, neither the USFDA nor any other federal agency has any regulatory authority over the manufacture or sale of any food, supplement, colloidal silver, or over any drug for that matter within the ‘several’ States. It may only regulate interstate commerce, which is only the actual shipment across the lines of the several States or within the District of Columbia or within any other territory not organized with a legislative body. Read the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act that brought this now “out of control” agency into existence in 1938. (Note: You must read the original act to get the correct language. In more recent government postings and printings, certain key phrases are deliberately left out so that we will not understand the limits of their authority.) The system is one of illusion rather than truth and operates on threats, fear and propaganda in order to strip us of our freedom. I will elaborate in future parts to this article.
Further prima facie evidence that the ‘United States’ ‘federal’ government has a very narrow and limited authority as do all so-called “federal” agencies is clearly illustrated in the 18th and 21st Amendments to the Constitution. In 1919, the 18th Amendment was ratified “abolishing” the manufacture, sales and transportation of intoxicating liquors and then later the 21st Amendment was purported to have “re-legalized” liquor. In truth, what was done with the 21th Amendment was to bring the 18th Amendment, “the so-called alcohol prohibition amendment”, back into compliance with the Constitutional mandates for the authority of the “federal’ government. The 18th Amendment had overstepped the boundaries of the federal government regulatory authority and the 21st Amendment simply corrected the Constitutional violations in the 18th. The substantive difference between the two is that in the 21st, the terms “manufacture” and “sale” are removed. They are stated to wit:
Amendment 18- (ratified 1/16/1919) Sec. 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.
Amendment 21 (ratified 12/5/1933) Sec. 2. The transportation or importation into any State, Territory, or possession of the United States for delivery or use therein of intoxicating liquors, in violation of the laws thereof, is hereby prohibited. To be continued in Part 2.
